The Leadership Quarterly 21 (2010) 211–230
Articles lists offered at ScienceDirect
The Leadership Quarterly
j o u l n a l l o m e p a g e: watts w watts. e t s electronic vehicles i elizabeth r. c o meters / t o c a to e / l e a q u a
Integrative leadership as well as the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations Barbara C. Crosby ⁎, John M. Bryson
Center to get Integrative Management and Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota
a r to i c l electronic
i n f um
a w s big t r a c t
This article presents a theoretical framework for understanding integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations that creates public value. We deﬁne integrative management as getting diverse organizations and agencies together in semipermanent methods — and typically around sector restrictions — to remedy complex open public problems and achieve the common good. Each of our framework features in particular the leadership roles and activities of collaboration sponsors and champions. The framework can be illustrated with examples through the development of MetroGIS, a geographic information program that stimulates better community problem-solving in the Minneapolis–St. Paul region with the US. A set of propositions exists to guide further research and to prompt reﬂective practice. © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Almost all rights set aside.
Keywords: Integrative leadership Cross-sector collaboration Collaborative leadership Community value Community leadership
Many major public problems or perhaps challenges — such as around the world, HIV/AIDS, economical development, low income, and homelessness — can be addressed effectively only if various organizations work together. Collaborators might include government authorities certainly, but often need to include businesses, nonproﬁt agencies, foundations, advanced schooling institutions, and community groupings as well. Market leaders and managers in federal government organizations thus face the necessity to inspire, mobilize, and preserve their own companies, but likewise to engage quite a few other partners in their problem-solving efforts. Even as we see it, this is the basic challenge of integrative public leadership — deﬁned as getting diverse teams and agencies together in semi-permanent techniques, and commonly across sector boundaries, to remedy complex open public problems and achieve the regular good. We have argued anywhere else that this sort of problems are typically due to the feature failings of government, business, and civil society and that eco friendly remedies need to draw within the characteristic talents of each sector while beating or reducing their weak points (Bryson & Crosby, 2008). In other words, the power to adopt and also deliver powerful solutions is definitely shared between sectors and organizations within the sectors. Integrative public commanders will have to business lead across sector boundaries to foster the requisite relationships and resource ﬂows necessary to produce attractive outcomes. Many analysts (e. g., Cleveland, 2002; Crosby & Bryson, 2005) have got provided insights about management in this " shared-power, noone-wholly-in-charge world, ” an increasingly appropriate descriptor initially of the modern world. Scholars also have made progress, development, improvement in considering the implications to get government electricity, authority, and responsibility in that world. Exactly what does it indicate, they have asked, when apparent " public” problems drip beyond government's power and authority, however citizens even now look to democratic governments to help solve all of them? Cleveland (1977, 1993, 2002) was between those who a couple of decades in the past ﬁrst started out popularizing the word " governance” to describe agreements (regimes) by which government bodies reveal power to types of organizations to develop signiﬁcant achievements of lasting public worth (Kettl, 2002, 2009; Light, 2002; Osborne, 2010). An amazing body of scholarship right now describes how public managers create and manage aide among governments, businesses, and nonproﬁts. Indeed, collaborative community management has turned into a hot topic (e. g.,...
References: Agranoff, R. (2007). Managing within just networks: Adding value to public businesses. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Agranoff, R. (March 2008). Enhancing performance through public sector networks: Mobilizing human capital in residential areas of practice. Public Performance & Supervision Review, 31(3), 320−347. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, Meters. (2003). Collaborative public managing: New strategies for local government authorities. Washington, POWER: Georgetown University Press. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (1998). Multinetwork management: Collaboration and the empty state in local monetary development. Journal of General public Administration Study and Theory, 8(1), 67−91. Alexander, M. A., Comfort and ease, M. N., Weiner, N. J., & Bogue, L. (2001). Command in collaborative community health partnerships. Nonproﬁt Management and Leadership, 12(2), 159−175. Allen, K. Elizabeth., & Cherrey, C. (2000). Systemic management: Enriching the meaning of our job. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. Altern, C. (1990). An exploratory analyze of conﬂict and coordination in interorganizational service delivery systems. Academy of Administration Journal, 33(3), 478−502. Arino, A., & de la Campanario, J. (1998). Learning from inability: Towards an evolutionary type of collaborative undertakings. Organization Science, 9(3), 306−325. Bachrach, L., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56, 947−952. Bachrach, P., & Baratz, Meters. S. (1963). Decisions and non-decisions: A great analytical framework. American Political Science Assessment, 57, 947−952. Bingham, T. B., & O 'Leary, R. (2008). Big concepts in collaborative public administration. Armonk, NYC: M. At the. Sharpe, Inc. Boland Jr., R. T., & Tenkasi, R. Sixth is v. (1995). Point of view making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Firm Science, 6(4), 350−372. Bolland, J., & Wilson, J. (1994). Three faces of integrative coordination: A model of interorganizational associations in community-based health and individual services. Overall health Services Study, 29(3), 341−366. Bolman, D. G., & Deal, Capital t. E. (2008). Reframing agencies: Artistry, choice, and management, 4th education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Bozeman, M. (2007). General public values and public fascination: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Buenos aires, D. C.: Georgetown School Press. Bryson, J. M. (2004). Ideal planning for community and nonproﬁt organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement, 3rd ed. Bay area: Jossey-Bass. Bryson, J. Meters., Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (July/August 2007). Placing the resource-based view of strategy and distinctive competencies to operate public organizations. Public Government Review, 702−717. Bryson, T. M., Ackermann, F., Eden, C., & Finn, C. (2004). Noticeable thinking: Area code causal umschlusselung for sensible business effects. New York: Wiley. Bryson, M. M., & Crosby, N. C. (1992). Leadership intended for the common very good: Tackling community problems within a shared-power globe. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Bryson, T. M., & Crosby, W. C. (2008). Failing in to cross-sector effort successfully. In L. W. Bingham & R. O 'Leary (Eds. ), Big ideas in collaborative open public management. Armonk, N. Sumado a.: M. Elizabeth. Sharpe. Bryson, J. Meters., Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, L. K. (2009). Understanding strategic planning and the formulation and implementation of strategic programs as a way of knowing: The contributions of actor-network theory. International General public Management Log, 12(2), 172−207. Bryson, L. M., Crosby, B. C., & Rock, M. M. (2008). Collaboration in ﬁghting trafﬁc traffic jam: A study of Minnesota 's urban collaboration agreement http://www.cts. umn. edu/Publications/ResearchReports/reportdetail. html? id=1714 Bryson, J., Crosby, N., & Natural stone, M. M. (2006). The style and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Selections from the materials. Public Supervision Review, 66(s1), 44−55. Bryson, J. Meters., Crosby, B., & Natural stone, M. M. (2007). Effectively designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: A preliminary test of propositions through the literature. Unpublished manuscript. Burns, J. M. (1978). Management. New York: Harper Collins. Carlile, P. 3rd there�s r. (2002). A pragmatic view expertise and boundaries: Boundary items in cool product development. Corporation Science, 13(4), 442−455. Carlile, P. L. (2004). Moving, translating, and transforming: An integrative construction for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555−568. Chen, B., & Graddy, E. A. (ARNOVA Conference, Nov 17–19, 2005). Inter-organizational aide for general public service delivery: A structure of preconditions, processes, and perceived outcomes. Unpublished manuscript. Chrislip, G. D. (2002). The collaborative leadership ﬁeldbook: A guide for citizens and civic commanders. San Francisco: Josey-Bass. Chrislip, M. D., & Larson, C. E. (1994). Collaborative leadership: How residents and social leadership can produce a difference. Bay area: Jossey-Bass. Cleveland, H. (1977). The third try at community order: U. S. insurance plan for an interdependent community. New York: Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies. Cleveland, L. (1993). Birthday of a new globe: An open minute for foreign leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Cleveland, H. (2002). Nobody in control: Essays within the future of command. New York: Steve Wiley.
N. C. Crosby, J. M. Bryson as well as The Command Quarterly twenty one (2010) 211–230
Craig, W. T., & Bitner, D. (1999). MetroGIS beneﬁts study. Unpublished PowerPoint Display. Retrieved from http://www.metrogis.org/beneﬁts/studies/ survey_1999_results. pdf Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. Meters. (2005). Management for the common good: Tackling public problems in a shared-power world. S . fransisco: Jossey-Bass. Crosby, B. C., & Kiedrowski, J. (2007). Integrative leadership: Observations from a University of Minnesota seminar series. Paper presented at the International Leadership Connection Annual Meeting, Vancouver, Canada. Donahue, T. D. (2004). On collaborative governance. Boston: John F. Kennedy College of Government, Harvard University. Feldman, M. S i9000., & Khademian, A. M. (2007). The role of the public manager in inclusion. Governance, 20(2), 305−324. Feldman, M. S i9000., Khademian, A. M., Ingram, H., & Schneider, A. S. (2006). Ways of being aware of and comprehensive management procedures. Public Government Review, sixty six, 89−99. Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. To. (2008). Routine dynamics. In D. Craig, & H. Hansen (Eds. ), The SAGE guide of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 302−315). London: SAGE. Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Chi town: The College or university of Chi town Press. Friedland, R., & Alford, Ur. (1991). Delivering society in: Symbols, techniques and institutional contradictions. In W. T. Powell & P. M. DiMaggio (Eds. ), The brand new institutionalism in organizational examination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Giddens, A. (1984). The cosmetic of world: Outline of any theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University or college of California Press. Giddens, A. (1979). Central complications in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social examination. Berkeley, CALIFORNIA: University of California Press. Goldsmith, T., & Eggers, W. D. (2004). Regulating by network: The new shape of the public sector, 1st ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Company. Gray, W. (1989). Participating: Finding prevalent ground for multiparty complications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Gray, M. (2000). Determining inter-organizational cooperation: Multiple ideas and multiple methods. In D. Faulkner & M. de Spherique (Eds. ), Perspectives on collaboration. Birmingham: Oxford University or college Press. Gray, B. (1996). Cross-sector associates: Collaborative complicite among business, government and communities. In C. Huxham (Ed. ), Creating collaborative advantage. Thousands of Oaks, FLORIDA: SAGE. Himmelman, A. T. (2002). Effort for a change. Minneapolis: Himmelman Asking. Hooijberg, R., Hunt, M. G., & Dodge, G. E. (1997). Leadership complexity and progress the leaderplex model. Journal of Managing, 23(3), 37−408. Human, S., & Provan, K. (1997). An aufstrebend theory of structure and outcomes in small-ﬁrm proper manufacturing systems. Academy of Management Log, 45(2), 327−365. Human, S i9000., & Provan, K. (2000). Legitimacy building in the progression of small-ﬁrm multilateral networks: A comparison study of success and demise. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 327−365. Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. New York: Routledge. Innes, J. Elizabeth., & Booher, D. Elizabeth. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework pertaining to evaluating collaborative planning. Diary of the American Planning Association, 65(4), 412−423. Jarzabkowski, G. (2005). Strategy as practice: An activity-based approach. London, uk: SAGE Journals. Kaplan, L. S., & Norton, G. P. (2004). Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets in to tangible results. Boston: Harvard Business Institution Press. Kastan, J. (2000). School-based mental health program development: An instance study of interorganizational effort. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 25(5), 845−862. Kellogg, K. C., Orlikowski, T. J., & Yates, T. (2006). Your life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination around boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organization Science, 17(1), 22−44. Kettl, M. F. (2002). The change of governance: Public government for twenty-ﬁrst century america. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins School Press. Kettl, D. N. (2009). The next government of the United States: Why the institutions are unsuccessful us as well as how to ﬁx these people, 1st education. New York: T. W. Norton & Co. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, second ed. Nyc: Harper Collins. Kouzes, M. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2007). The command challenge, 4th ed. Bay area: Jossey-Bass. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Nyc: Oxford University or college Press. Legislation, J. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous architectural: The case in the Portuguese enlargement. In Watts. E. Bjiker, T. G. Hughes, & T. L. Pinch (Eds. ), The social development of technical systems: Fresh directions inside the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MUM: MIT Press. Law, T., & Hassard, J. (1999). Actor network theory after. Oxford, Britain: Blackwell Creating The Sociological Review. Lawrence, T. M., Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2002). Institutional associated with interorganizational collaboration: The beginning of proto-institutions. Academy of Management Diary, 45(1), 281−290. Levina, D., & Orlikowski, W. L. (2009). Understanding shifting electrical power relations inside and around organizations: A vital genre examination. Academy of Management Diary, 52(4), 672−703. Light, S. C. (2002). Government is actually greatest successes. Washington, POWER: Brookings Organization Press. Linden, R. Meters. (2002). Functioning across restrictions: Making effort work in government and nonproﬁt organizations. Bay area: Jossey-Bass. Lomaz, J. S i9000. (1974). Electrical power: A major view. New York: MacMillan. Luke, J. S. (1998). Catalytic leadership: Techniques for an interconnected world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Maguire, S., Sturdy, C., & Lawrence, Big t. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging ﬁelds: HIV/AIDS treatment proposal in Canada. Senior high of Managing Journal, 47(5), 657−679. Mattessich, P., Murray-Close, M., & Monsey, M. (2001). Cooperation: What makes this work. St . Paul, MN: Amherst L. Wilder Base. Merrill-Sands, Deb., & Sheridan, B. (1996). Developing and managing collaborative alliances: Lessons from a review of the books No . 3). Boston: Simmons Institute pertaining to Leadership and alter. Metropolitan Council. (2007). A bold test: The Metropolitan Council at 40 years. St . Paul MN: Metropolitan Council. Mintzberg, They would. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic organizing: Reconceiving jobs for planning, plans, organizers. New York: Free Press. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, L. (1998). Approach safari: A guided travel through the wilds of proper management. Nyc: The Free Press. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public benefit. Cambridge, MOTHER: Harvard College or university Press. Mors, R. T., Buss, Capital t. F., & Kinghorn, C. M. (Eds. ). (2007). Transforming community leadership pertaining to the 21st century. Armonk, BIG APPLE: M. Electronic. Sharpe. Mumford, M. Deb., Zaccaro, S i9000. J., Harding, F. Deb., Jacobs, Big t. O., & Fleishman, E. A. (2000). Leadership expertise for a changing world: Solving complex interpersonal problems. Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 11−35. Nutt, P. C. (2002). So why decisions fail: Avoiding the blunders and traps that may lead to debacles. S . fransisco: Berrett-Koehler Writers. O 'Leary, R., & Bingham, L. B. (Eds. ). (2009). The collaborative public administrator. Washington DC: Georgetown School Press. Ormsby, T., Napoleon, E., Burkie, R., Groessl, C., & Feaster, D. (2004). Observing ArcGIS, subsequent ed. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press. Osborne, S. P. (Ed. ). (2010). The modern public governance? New perspectives on the theory and practice of open public governance. Birmingham: Routledge. Web page, S. (2004). Measuring answerability for results in interagency collaboratives. Public Supervision Review, 64(5), 591−606. Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). Distributed leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of management. Thousand Oak trees, CA: SAGE. Pentland, W. T., & Feldman, Meters. S. (2007). Narrative systems: Patterns of technology and organization. Corporation Science, 18(5), 781−795. Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. W., & Sturdy, C. (2000). Inter-organizational cooperation and the dynamics of institutional ﬁelds. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1), 23−43. Provan, K., & Milward, L. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental well being systems. Management Science Quarterly, 40, 1−33. Provan, E., & Kenis, P. (2005). Modes of network governance and ramifications for general public network supervision. Paper presented at the Eighth National General public Management Study Conference, Los Angeles, Sept. 29–Oct. 1 . Engagement ring, P. T., & Truck de Ven, Andrew They would. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. School of Managing Review, 19(1), 90−118. Roberts, N. C., & King, P. M. (1996). Modifying public insurance plan: Dynamics of policy entrepreneurship and creativity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
B. C. Crosby, J. Meters. Bryson / The Management Quarterly 21 (2010) 211–230
Robinson, A. H. (1982). Early thematic mapping in the history of cartography. Chicago: University or college of Chicago Press. Salamon, L. Meters. (Ed. ). (2002). The various tools of government: Helpful information for the new governance. New York: Oxford University Press. Scott, T. R. (1987). Organizations: Realistic, natural, and open devices. Englewood Coves, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Senge, P. M. (Fall 1990). The leader 's new work: Building learning companies. Sloan Managing Review, 7−23. Senge, P. M., Smith, B., Schley, S. D., & Laur, J. (2008). The necessary innovation: How individuals and agencies are working together to create a sustainable world. Nyc: Doubleday. Sharfman, M. P., Gray, W., & Yan, A. (1991). The circumstance of interorganizational collaboration in the garment sector: An institutional perspective. Record of Used Behavioral Technology, 27(2), 181−208. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations' and boundary items: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley is Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Interpersonal Studies of Science, 19(3), 387−420. Natural stone, M. M. Toward understanding policy setup through public–private partnerships: The situation of the community employment relationship. ” Offered at the Relationship for Open public Policy Examination and Administration conference, Oct, 2004, The atlanta area. Stone, M. M. (2007). Governance in collaborations: Toward a research framework. Unpublished manuscript. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing capacity: Strategic and institutional strategies. Academy of Management Assessment, 20(3), 571−610. Sydow, M., & Staber, U. (2002). Institutional embeddedness of job networks: The situation of content material production in German tv. Regional Studies, 36, 215−227. Thornton, L. H., & Ocasio, T. (1999). Institutional logics as well as the historical a contingency of power in businesses: Executive succession in the advanced schooling publishing industry 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801−843. Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, M. (2007). Difficulty leadership theory: Shﬁting management from the commercial age towards the knowledge period. Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298−318. Van para Ven, Claire H., & Walker, G. (1984). The dynamics of interorganizational skill. Administrative Technology Quarterly, twenty nine, 598−621. Waddock, S. (1986). Public–private partnership as cultural product and process. Exploration in Company Social Efficiency and Insurance plan, 8, 273−300. Weber, Elizabeth., & Khademian, A. Meters. (2008). Controlling collaborative processes: Common methods, uncommon conditions. Administration & Society, 40(5), 431. Winer, M., & Ray, K. (1994). Collaboration handbook: Creating, sustaining, and enjoying the journey. St Paul, MN: Amherst H. Wilder Groundwork. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study study: Design and methods. 1, 000 Oaks, LOS ANGELES: SAGE.